The centrifuge runs unchecked. Crystallised value concentrates upward; everyone else evaporates. Digital feudalism.
The Drift is the framework's default-bad scenario — what happens if the protocol does not stand up and no H4 ASI emerges. The five-axis flywheel runs; the Ep × Ci interaction (v4) accelerates it; the K1/K4 verification inversion (v6) puts the price signal exactly the wrong way; the loneliness subsidy (the Λ1 axis, v6) holds the consumer economy together while the productive substrate hollows out.
The endpoint: a configuration that resembles feudalism more than capitalism. A small class of crystal-holders (those whose work concentrated into durable assets pre-Drift). A large class of evaporators (those whose work consumed in the moment, with no protocol to crystallise it for them). The middle that the post-1945 settlement built — measurable, mobile, credentialed, paid for skill transfer — falls out.
In v6's honest accounting, the Drift is the 60% case. Three reasons:
The Drift is not predetermined. It is the equilibrium the system reaches when no one actively resists it. The framework's response — HOP, the protocol, the Wizard scenario — is the active resistance.
The Drift is the framework's diagnostic. It is what the math predicts if the math is right and nothing intervenes. It is also the scenario most readers recognise immediately — the present tense feels like the early Drift, and the framework gives it a name. The Drift's role is not to scare; it is to make the gradient legible enough that the Wizard becomes a project worth standing up.